How, then, should the love of God and the wrath of God be
understood to relate to each other? One evangelical cliché has it that God
hates the sin but loves the sinner. There is a small element of truth in these
words: God has nothing but hate for the sin, but it would be wrong to conclude
that God has nothing but hate for the sinner. A difference must be maintained
between God’s view of sin and his view of the sinner. Nevertheless the cliché
(God hates the sin but loves the sinner) is false on the face of it and should
be abandoned. Fourteen times in the first fifty psalms alone, we are told that
God hates the sinner, his wrath is on the liar, and so forth. In the Bible, the
wrath of God rests both on the sin (Rom. 1:18ff.) and on the sinner (John
3:36).
Our problem, in part, is that in human
experience wrath and love normally abide in mutually exclusive compartments.
Love drives wrath out, or wrath drives love out. We come closest to bringing
them together, perhaps, in our responses to a wayward act by one of our
children, but normally we do not think that a wrathful person is loving.
But this is not the way it is with God.
God’s wrath is not an implacable, blind rage. However emotional it may be, it
is an entirely reasonable and willed response to offenses against his holiness.
But his love, as we saw in the last chapter, wells up amidst his perfections and is not generated by the loveliness of
the loved. Thus there is nothing intrinsically impossible about wrath and
love being directed toward the same individual or people at the same time. God
in his perfections must be wrathful against his rebel image-bearers, for they
have offended him; God in his perfections must be loving toward his rebel
image-bearers, for he is that kind of God.
Carson, D. A. (2000). The difficult
doctrine of the love of God (68–69). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.
No comments:
Post a Comment